The National Diabetes COVID-19 Response Group Collaborative

Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic meant many diabetes staff were redeployed to support general inpatient care. Information from London and Italy suggested people with diabetes and COVID-19 infection had poorer outcomes, and that the infection might trigger new onset diabetes. In response, the National Diabetes Inpatient COVID-19 Response Group was convened in the last week of March 2020. Its purpose was to maintain consistent support for people with diabetes and provide COVID-specifi c guidance for specialists and non-specialists. Specialists in diabetes, pharmacy and psychology, from all four UK nations, met weekly, or more often, to create a series of pragmatic guidance documents.

Innovation

At the beginning of the pandemic many diabetes specialists were redeployed, contributing to increased variation of care. Clinicians from across the UK came together to pool their specialist knowledge and produce guidelines to offer a consistent approach to improve outcomes. Each guideline was put together in weeks, with the collaborative meeting regularly in the evenings. At the time there was no other specific COVID-19 diabetes guidance/advice available. Seven sets of documents were produced. These included: 1. Documents to maintain and support diabetes teams. These three documents described the vital role diabetes teams played in the crisis and advised which essential diabetes services should remain during the pandemic. The Speciality Template demonstrated how to redeploy a reduced diabetes team and, combined with the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendations) went to all Directors of services in Trusts/Health boards in the second wave. In many Trusts this led to more effective deployment of diabetes teams. 2. Front door guidance. Early in the pandemic it was apparent that COVID-19 in people with or without previous diabetes increased the risk of severe hyperglycaemia, DKA and HHS. The guidance alerted admitting units to this risk, to check glucose in all admissions and ketones if hyperglycaemic. It provided advice on emergency diabetes management, which medications to stop, and general advice. 3. Guidance for managing inpatient hyperglycaemia. In view of the severe insulin resistance encountered, reports that moderate hyperglycaemia was associated with worse outcome, and limited availability of IV insulin pumps, this guideline provided a modified high dose basal-bolus regime. It intervened at a BG>12 mmol/l, lower than usual. It was used successfully across the UK. 4. Dexamethasone/glucocorticosteroid therapy in COVID-19 patients. The news that treatment with highdose glucocorticoids improved outcomes in people with COVID-19 infection, though welcomed, raised concerns around effective glucose management. These medications affect glucose metabolism directly, which, combined with COVID-19-associated insulin resistance and impaired beta cell function, impacts people with and without diabetes. The guidance used a similar basal-bolus regimen to that in the hyperglycaemia guideline, but employed even higher insulin doses. Emphasis was also given to rapid dose de-escalation on stopping steroids to prevent hypoglycaemia and close follow-up on discharge. This guidance is in widespread use across the UK. 5.Hyperclycaemia/ diabetes guidance for virtual wards. This was produced to support the safe management of hyperglycaemia in those receiving glucocorticoid treatment for COVID-19 infection outside of a hospital environment. It was simplified, given the less intensive support that might be available in these environments. The final two guidelines were: 6.Guideline for managing DKA using subcutaneous insulin and 7. Safe and supported discharge to reduce readmissions and improve patient fl ow.

Equality, Diversity and Variation

During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic it was estimated that more than 30% of people in hospital had diabetes or steroid-induced hyperglycaemia. Clinicians who were not diabetes specialists were often caring for people with diabetes, resulting in inequity of care for some. The guidelines helped reduce variation in care by offering advice during a time of unprecedented uncertainty. For people with diabetes, it was hoped the recommended service configurations would offer reassurance that they would still receive good and consistent care. An information leaflet for people with diabetes was also produced to inform, support and empower people with diabetes on their hospital discharge. The National Diabetes COVID-19 group had representation from all four nations, with specialists including diabetologists, diabetes specialist nurses, pharmacists and psychologists. The perspective of people with diabetes came from Diabetes UK, and the guidelines were also approved by its Council for Health Care Professionals. The guidelines were designed for people with pre-existing diabetes but also considered those with new onset diabetes triggered by COVID-19 infection and those with steroid induced hyperglycaemia. The guidelines are available free to all Trusts in the UK and facilities abroad. The guidelines are also hosted on Diabetes UK and ABCD websites.

Results

The objective was to produce brief, essential guidance which could be easily implemented in any Trust. The success is reflected in very positive feedback, both formally and informally, publications of the documents and invitations to present the work at many conferences/webinars nationally and globally. Downloads from the ABCD and Diabetes UK websites totalled 30,000.

Dissemination and Sustainability

All guideline documents are downloadable from the ABCD and DiabetesUK websites. There have been four publications in Diabetic Medicine and guidance on remodelling of diabetes services has been included in a publication in the European Journal of Endocrinology. There have been national and international presentations. Members are looking to standardise further national pathways for emergency care and discharge.

User Feedback

An ABCD survey received responses from 188 consultant members, published in BJD journal. Answers to the question ‘Have you found the ABCD COVID-19 web pages useful?’ were: Yes 130; No 3; I’ve not looked 55. User feedback included this testimonial from Hannah Beba, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust: “I cannot say enough good things about these guidelines. These guidelines kept our diabetes patients safe during what was an incredibly uncertain time. There use transcended diabetes teams being used by all specialities and by the full multidisciplinary team. From a personal point of view it was fantastic to get the pharmacists educated quickly on these guidelines and for them to have a workable document to use and signpost to.”

Back to the top



QiC Diabetes Highly Commended 2021
Diabetes Collaborative Project of the Year
The National Diabetes COVID-19 Response Group Collaborative
by The National Diabetes COVID-19 Response Group

Quality In Care Diabetes

QiC Diabetes is partnered by:
Supported by:
  • 2022 KEY DATES
  • Open for Entry:
    Monday 28 March 2022
  • Entry Deadline:
    Friday 1 July 2022
  • Judging Day:
    Tuesday 6 September 2022
  • Voting Deadline:
    Monday 12 September 2022
  • Awards Ceremony:
    Thursday 13 October 2022